Skip to content

Conversation

Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor

@Jarcho Jarcho commented Jul 18, 2021

fixes: #7340
changelog: Fix ICE in modulo_one in const contexts

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @Manishearth

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jul 18, 2021
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 18, 2021

📌 Commit 5bfc256 has been approved by Manishearth

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 18, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 5bfc256 with merge e93df0b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 18, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Manishearth
Pushing e93df0b to master...

@bors bors merged commit e93df0b into rust-lang:master Jul 18, 2021
@flip1995 flip1995 mentioned this pull request Jul 19, 2021
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2021
Rustup

r? `@ghost`

Out of cycle sync for 2 ICE fixes #7470 #7471 #7473

changelog: none
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2021
Update Clippy

This is an out-of-cycle Clippy update, to fix 3 ICEs before the release (This should be merged before beta is branched):

rust-lang/rust-clippy#7470
rust-lang/rust-clippy#7471
rust-lang/rust-clippy#7473

cc `@jackh726` `@JohnTitor` rust-lang/rust-clippy#7470 was caused by rust-lang#86867. I saw the same ICE in the last rustup for Clippy though, so this might be a more general problem. Is there something we should check before calling `layout_of`? Should we always check for `ty.has_escaping_bound_vars()` before calling `layout_of`? Or is this overkill?

r? `@Manishearth`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unexpected internal compiler panic
4 participants